Legal Opinion
In re D.J.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 19, 1987No. 85-870PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, Associate Judge:
Appellant D.J., a juvenile, was adjudged delinquent for possession with intent to distribute phencyclidine (PCP) and marijuana (D.C. Code § 33-541(a) (1986 Supp.)). Before trial, D.J. moved to suppress evidence and statements on the ground that both were obtained by police subsequent to an unconstitutional search and seizure. After an evidentiary hearing, the motion was denied. The evidence adduced at the hearing became the basis for a stipulated trial; D.J. was found guilty of the charged offenses. D.J. appeals the denial of his motion to suppress evidence. We reverse.
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Peay v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Duhart v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- State v. TalbotCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.