Legal Opinion
Smith v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 28, 1989No. 84-1643PublishedCited by 86 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, Associate Judge:
Following a suppression hearing and a bench trial, appellant was convicted of carrying a pistol without a license. On his appeal, a majority of a division of this court affirmed his conviction, rejecting appellant’s argument that the pistol was seized in violation of his Fourth Amendment rights and that its admission into evidence was constitutional error. Smith v. United States, 525 A.2d 200 (D.C.App.), vacated, 531 A.2d 288 (D.C.App.1987). We granted appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc and vacated the division’s opinion and judgment. We hold the police did not…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Rivas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- State v. Jason L.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
- Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Peay v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- State v. KrepsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.