Legal Opinion
United States v. Gray
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 16, 1949No. Cr. Nos. 1665-49, 1669-49, 1670-49, 1675-1682-49PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
87 F.Supp. 436 (1949)
UNITED STATES
v.
GRAY et al.
Cr. Nos. 1665-49, 1669-49, 1670-49, 1675-1682-49.
United States District Court District of Columbia.
December 16, 1949.
Curtis P. Mitchell, of Washington, D. C., for the defendants, for the motion.
George Morris Fay, United States Attorney, and C. Frank Reifsnyder, Assistant United States Attorney, both of Washington, D. C., opposed.
HOLTZOFF, District Judge.
The defendant moves to dismiss the indictment on the ground that he was deprived of a preliminary hearing before the United States Commissioner by reason of the fact that the Commissioner…
2Cited by28 opinions
- M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- Commonwealth v. O'BRIENSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- United States Ex Rel. Bogish v. TeesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- Willard Barrett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
- Yodock v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.