Jannes v. Microwave Communications, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ROBSON, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant Goeken’s motion for summary judgment. 1 For the reasons hereinafter stated, this motion shall be granted only as to preclude Microwave Communications of America, Inc. (MI-COM) from recovering as a shareholder of Microwave Communications, Inc. (MCI) under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
This derivative securities fraud action was brought by a shareholder of MCI on behalf of MCI against MI-COM, the corporation that how owns a significant portion of the stock of MCI. Also, the Chairman of MI-COM,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Southern Pacific Co. v. BogertSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Bangor Punta Operations, Inc. v. Bangor & Aroostook RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Jane Perlman v. C. Russell Feldmann, Newport Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- O. Q. Kizziar and Mildred Kizziar, His Wife v. B. L. Dollar, an Individual Doing Business as B. L. Dollar Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
- Wool v. Solar Aircraft Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1964
3Cited by2 opinions
- National Union Electric Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Boggess v. HoganDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1975