Legal Opinion

Bauer v. Bauer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1913No. Docket No. 61PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Barry; Smith, J. Bill by Charles Duane Bauer against Charlotte Bauer for divorce. Defendant filed a cross-bill for a divorce. From a decree for complainant, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.

The bill is filed for a divorce. There was an answer in the nature of a cross-bill, in which defendant also asks that the marriage be dissolved and for alimony. There was an answer to the answer. The testimony was taken in open court, and complainant had a decree, which also settled property rights.

In this court a legal proposition is advanced which demands attention. When the cause was heard, complainant did not appear in court, and the inference —the natufal one perhaps — is drawn by defendant that he was not in the State. During the hearing, defendant moved the court as follows:

“May it…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Eaton v. KnowlesMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Page v. PageMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Hamilton v. HamiltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Teitelman v. BloomsteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  2. Starr v. MorsetteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Cavanaugh v. CardamoneMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Lester v. LesterMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Vondell v. PurdySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API