Legal Opinion

Fosbre v. State

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1969No. 39697PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

The sole question on appeal is whether the state is liable for interest upon a judgment entered against it pursuant to the state “Tort Claims Act,” which provides:

The state of Washington, whether acting' in its governmental or proprietary capacity, shall be liable for damages arising out of its tortious conduct to the same extent as if it were a private person or corporation.

(RCW 4.92.090)

June 28, 1965, respondent recovered a judgment of $157,164 against the state in an action under the statute. March 2, 1967, the judgment was affirmed. Fosbre v. State, 70 Wn.2d 578, 424 P.2d 901 (1967). May…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fosbre v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Bond v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Pape v. ArmstrongWashington Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Sintra, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Sintra, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Andrade v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982
  4. Architectural Woods, Inc. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Carrillo v. City of Ocean ShoresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API