Fosbre v. State
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
The sole question on appeal is whether the state is liable for interest upon a judgment entered against it pursuant to the state “Tort Claims Act,” which provides:
The state of Washington, whether acting' in its governmental or proprietary capacity, shall be liable for damages arising out of its tortious conduct to the same extent as if it were a private person or corporation.
(RCW 4.92.090)
June 28, 1965, respondent recovered a judgment of $157,164 against the state in an action under the statute. March 2, 1967, the judgment was affirmed. Fosbre v. State, 70 Wn.2d 578, 424 P.2d 901 (1967). May…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fosbre v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Bond v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Pape v. ArmstrongWashington Supreme Court · 1955
3Cited by20 opinions
- Sintra, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Sintra, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Andrade v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982
- Architectural Woods, Inc. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- Carrillo v. City of Ocean ShoresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.