Legal Opinion

Holland v. Spell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1896No. 17,038PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From the Henry Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHackney, C. J.

Joshua Holland, whose administratrix has been substituted as appellant herein, sued the appellee and two others in trespass for breaking down certain fences. The appellee, with his co-defendants, in addition to the general denial, justified the acts complained of as having been committed by Spell, as the marshal of the town of New Castle, pursuant to an order of the board of trustees of said town and by virtue of certain condemnation proceedings, wherein that part of the enclosure included within the fences destroyed was condemned for a public street, and the plaintiff’s damages were assessed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chamberlain v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Test v. LarshIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Baltimore, Ohio & Chicago Railroad v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Byer v. Town of New CastleIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Hawley v. HarrallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1848

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Russell v. BushSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Lux & Talbott Stone Co. v. DonaldsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Western Construction Co. v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Williams v. Jefferson CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  5. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. NowlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1904

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API