White v. Hayden
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County. A. R. Conklin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
—This cause and L. A. 461 between the same parties present the same question. Plaintiff is a member of the board of supervisors for Kern county; he rendered services as supervisor and ex officio road commissioner for which he was allowed by the board the sum of eighteen hundred and three dollars and fifty cents, and on July 18, 1896, payment was ' ordered to be made out of the salary fund of the county ■ and a warrant was ordered drawn on the treasury for the amount. The auditor refused to draw his warrant, whereupon this action was brought to compel him to do so. A general demurrer…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Babcock v. GoodrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- McFarland v. McCowenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Lamberson v. JefferdsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Ellis v. Tulare CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Sehorn v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chilson v. JeromeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- County of Sutter v. McGriffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Standard Elementary School District v. HealyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- State of Arizona v. AshArizona Supreme Court · 1939