Legal Opinion

Luttrell v. Panozzo

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 17, 1993No. 1-90-3330Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

625 N.E.2d 695 (1993)

252 Ill. App.3d 597

192 Ill.Dec. 540

Richard LUTTRELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Judy PANOZZO, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 1-90-3330.

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Second Division.

August 17, 1993.

McGrath and Harty, Orland Park (Richard B. Harty, D. Varraveto, Jr., of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.

McKenna, Storer, Rowe, White & Farrug, Chicago (James P. DeNardo, Sara E. Cook, of counsel), for defendant-appellee.

2Opinion of the Court · DiVITOJustice DiVITO

Following a hearing on a rule to show cause, plaintiff Richard Luttrell was found in indirect civil contempt for violating an order restraining him from…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. FeiockSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. In Re Marriage of LogstonIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  3. In re Marriage of BettsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  4. Rothschild & Co. v. Sons Piano Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Harvey v. CarponelliAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API