Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Atkinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 19, 1984Published

1Opinion of the Court

— Appeal from an order of the Surrogate’s Court of Cortland County (Kepner, Jr., S.), entered November 28, 1983, which granted a motion to quash a subpoena, f New York follows the rule that a witness cannot be compelled to give his opinion as an expert against his will (People ex rel. Kraushaar Bros. & Co. v Thorpe, 296 NY 223), but the line between an expert’s opinion testimony and fact testimony can be difficult to draw (Plummer v Macy & Co., 69 AD2d 765). A distinction has been recognized between an expert’s testimony concerning custom and usage of the trade in general and his testimony…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shannahan v. . Empire Engineering Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Kulak v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. People Ex Rel. Kraushaar Bros. & Co. v. ThorpeNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  4. Plummer v. R. H. Macy & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  5. Frye v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API