Legal Opinion
Becker v. Silverman
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 24, 1986No. 85 Civ. 6757 (CHT)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TENNEY, District Judge.
The plaintiff in this action, Barry Becker (“Becker”), contends that the defendant, Robert Silverman (“Silverman”), violated Section 10(b) (“§ 10(b)”) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), 15 U.S.C. 78j, by making certain misrepresentations in connection with the purchase of stock. In addition, the amended complaint sets forth pendent state law claims for common law fraud and breach of fiduciary duty. 1 The defendant has filed a motion pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. (“Rule”) 12(b)(6) and 9(b) for an order dismissing the plaintiff’s amended complaint…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ryan v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Quinn v. Syracuse Model Neighborhood Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sea Spray Holdings, Ltd. v. Pali Financial Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Jamaica Hospital Medical Center, Inc. v. United Health Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- Graphic Scanning Corp. v. YampolDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988