John Hancock Financial Services, Inc., and John Hancock Life Insurance Company (Formerly John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company) v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BRYSON, Circuit Judge.
John Hancock Financial Services, Inc., and John Hancock Life Insurance Company (collectively, “Hancock”) appeal from the decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims denying a claim for a tax refund. Hancock invoked the “tax benefit rule” in an effort to obtain, for certain years, tax benefits that it was unable to use in earlier years. In a thorough opinion, the trial judge held that the tax benefit rule did not apply in the context of this case. John Hancock Fin. Servs., Inc. v. United States, 57 Fed.Cl. 643 (Fed.Cl.2003). We agree that the tax benefit rule is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hillsboro National Bank v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Indianapolis Life Insurance Company and Subsidiary v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- American Mutual Life Insurance Company and Subsidiaries v. United States of America, the Stock Company Information Group, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Cuna Mutual Life Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Allstate Insurance Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wirth v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Marshall v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Sturrus v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
- RB Alden Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.