Legal Opinion

City of Montpelier v. Gates

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 13, 1933PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPowers, C. J.

This is a petition for a writ of mandamus to compel the fiscal officers of the State to pay to the petitioner and certain interveners their respective claims under section 48, part I, of the Income and Franchise Tax Act of 1931, Acts 1931, No. 17, part I, § 48. The petition is answered and demurred to. In view of the importance of the case to the State and its officers, and the facts being conceded, the demurrer will be construed as a motion, Clement v. Graham, 78 Vt. 290, 306, 63 Atl. 146, Ann. Cas. 1913E, 1208, and the merits of the controversy disposed of without regard to the technical…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Davis-Smith Co. v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. People ex rel. McCauley & Tevis v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Carr v. State ex rel. CoetlosquetIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Commonwealth ex rel. Attorney General v. MathuesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  5. Van Horn v. State ex rel. AbbottNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Lockyer v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. Lead Industries, Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  3. State v. HagertyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State Highway Board v. GatesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1938
  5. Associated Hospital Service of Maine v. MahoneySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API