Legal Opinion

Rhoades v. Rhoades

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 20, 1979No. 7921DC276PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.

This appeal presents for our interpretation paragraph 9 of the separation agreement, set out above. The agreement gave plaintiff the “full custody and control of the two minor children” with defendant having visitation rights. Plaintiff also received sole title to the homeplace owned by the parties. It thus appears the parties intended plaintiff to have the responsibility of rearing the children and supervising their health, welfare and education. Insofar as the defendant was concerned, his duty was to pay the monthly support and refrain from interfering with the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jones v. Palace Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. Church v. HancockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Lumber Co. v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. Mullen v. SawyerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Carpenter v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gillespie v. DeWittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Vestal v. VestalCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Brown v. ScismCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Berrier v. BerrierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Novant Health, Inc. v. Aetna U.S. Healthcare of the Carolinas, Inc.North Carolina Business Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API