United States v. Traugott Schmidt & Sons
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
TUTTLE, District Judge.
The subject-matter of this cause is before the court (for the second time) on a motion to dismiss the declaration. On the previous healing a motion to dismiss the declaration then pending was granted for the reasons stated in' the written opinion then filed; as - reported in 291 F. 382. After the filing of that opinion, a new declaration was filed, - which avoided the objections raised tó the original declaration, as sustained in the opinion mentioned. The motion to dismiss the present declaration involves questions not decided by this court in its previous opinion.
By…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Daniels v. TearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Pierce Oil Corp. v. Phoenix Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. PowersDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1921
- United States v. SmithDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1922
- United States v. Traugott Schmidt & SonsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1923
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. McFarlandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1926
- Dallas Hotel Co. v. BuffingtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- United States v. KrausCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1929