United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Oanh Vu Nguyen, Cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
THORNBERRY, Circuit Judge:
A jury convicted the defendant, Oanh Vu Nguyen, of violating the Endangered Species Act by illegally possessing a threatened species of sea turtle, see 16 U.S.C.A. §§ 1538(a)(1)(G), 1540(b)(1) (West 1985 & Supp.1990); 50 C.F.R. § 227.71(d) (1989), and by illegally importing the turtle, see 16 U.S.C.A. §§ 1538(a)(1)(G), 1540(b)(1); 50 C.F.R. § 227.71(a) (1989). The trial judge instructed the jury that they could convict Nguyen even if he did not know that the turtle was a threatened species or that his conduct was illegal. On appeal, Nguyen contends that the trial…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Liparota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. BalintSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. Munoz-FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- The United States of America v. Joe Alvin AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. BrandonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- State v. CurryWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- United States v. Harry Edward SingletonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. David Grigsby, Doris GrigsbyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Chad Kirch McKittrickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.