Legal Opinion

United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Oanh Vu Nguyen, Cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 30, 1990No. 90-2023PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THORNBERRY, Circuit Judge:

A jury convicted the defendant, Oanh Vu Nguyen, of violating the Endangered Species Act by illegally possessing a threatened species of sea turtle, see 16 U.S.C.A. §§ 1538(a)(1)(G), 1540(b)(1) (West 1985 & Supp.1990); 50 C.F.R. § 227.71(d) (1989), and by illegally importing the turtle, see 16 U.S.C.A. §§ 1538(a)(1)(G), 1540(b)(1); 50 C.F.R. § 227.71(a) (1989). The trial judge instructed the jury that they could convict Nguyen even if he did not know that the turtle was a threatened species or that his conduct was illegal. On appeal, Nguyen contends that the trial…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Liparota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. BalintSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. United States v. Munoz-FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. The United States of America v. Joe Alvin AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. BrandonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  2. State v. CurryWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. United States v. Harry Edward SingletonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. David Grigsby, Doris GrigsbyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. Chad Kirch McKittrickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API