Legal Opinion

Memphis Power & Light Co. v. City of Memphis

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1937PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney

The bill seeks to enjoin the defendants from proceeding with a contract already entered into with the Tennessee Valley Authority (hereinafter referred to as TVA) and a contract about to be entered into with the Federal Public Works Administration (hereinafter called PWA), upon the ground that such contracts violate certain provisions of the State and Federal Constitutions. The cause was heard by both chancellors in Memphis, who sustained a demurrer to the bill and dismissed it.

In Tennessee Public Service Co. v. City of Knoxville, 170 Tenn., 40, 91 S. W. (2d), 566, 56S, 569, it was said:

“Can…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Hoke & Economides v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Local 266, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Williams v. Town of MorristownCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1949
  3. Frankfort Distillers Corporation v. LibertoTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Weakley County Municipal Electric System v. VickCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1957
  5. City of Middlesboro v. Kentucky Utilities Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API