Legal Opinion

State v. Miller

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 28, 2011No. 99,232PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Luckert, J.:

This appeal follows the second trial of Saul Arthur Miller, who was convicted of rape, aggravated criminal sodomy, and two counts of aggravated indecent liberties with a child. Miller s first trial ended in a mistrial when the State repeatedly violated the trial court’s pretrial order limiting admission of the victim’s statement. That mistrial becomes important in this appeal because Miller alleges the retrial violated his right to be protected from double jeopardy. Miller also argues the prosecutor committed misconduct, the trial court…

2Cases cited71 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State v. RaskieSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  2. State v. PeppersSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  3. State v. BenningtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  4. State v. HaberleinSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  5. Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API