Briggs v. Adel

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Deshawn Briggs, et al., No. CV-18-02684-PHX-EJM 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 County of Maricopa, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Quash Defendant TASC’s 16 Subpoena to Slepian Smith, PLLC. (Doc. 220). TASC filed a Response (Doc. 230), and 17 Plaintiffs filed a Reply (Doc. 235). The Court finds this matter suitable for decision 18 without oral argument. For the reasons explained below, the undersigned will grant 19 Plaintiffs’ motion in part. 20 I. FACTUAL AND…