Legal Opinion

Springfield Photo Mount Co. v. Kriensky

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided January 26, 1984PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLenhoff, J.

The plaintiffs complaint seeks recovery of $9,960.00 for goods sold and delivered to the defendant, together with service charges, interest, costs and attorney’s fees.

In response thereto, the defendant’s answer denied liability, claimed that the involved goods were sold to a corporate entity, not to the defendant; that the goods were defective to be returned; and, that the plaintiff overcharged for said goods.

The facts reported reveal that the case was set for trial on June 22,1982 at 9:00 a.m.; that both parties appeared in court with the plaintiff prepared to proceed but the defendant…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Davis v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  2. International Fidelity Insurance v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  3. Bartley v. PhillipsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  4. Trustees of the Stigmatine Fathers, Inc. v. Secretary of Administration & FinanceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  5. Riley v. DAVISON CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reznik v. FriswellMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2003
  2. Maine Drilling & Blasting, Inc. v. Lorusso Corp.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API