Maine Drilling & Blasting, Inc. v. Lorusso Corp.
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part 1
Concurring In Part, Dissenting In Part Opinion
2Concurring in part, dissenting in part · ShubowShubow, J.
To the extent
the effect of the major decision is to remand the case for further *24consideration by the trial judge, I concur. I dissent, however, from the substantive conclusion that the trial judge erred in vacating a default judgment in the sum of $24,660.80 entered within weeks of original service given that the defendant promptly moved for relief four days after issuance of execution. I dissent, also, from the unwillingness of the majority to recognize that interlocutory review in this case was inappropriate and finally, from its failure to…
3Cases cited20 opinions
- Berube v. McKesson Wine & Spirits Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- Chavoor v. LewisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Pollack v. KellyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Bushnell v. BushnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Krock v. Consolidated Mines & Power Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.