Legal Opinion

Maine Drilling & Blasting, Inc. v. Lorusso Corp.

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided February 28, 1986Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part 1

Concurring In Part, Dissenting In Part Opinion

2Concurring in part, dissenting in part · ShubowShubow, J.

To the extent

the effect of the major decision is to remand the case for further *24consideration by the trial judge, I concur. I dissent, however, from the substantive conclusion that the trial judge erred in vacating a default judgment in the sum of $24,660.80 entered within weeks of original service given that the defendant promptly moved for relief four days after issuance of execution. I dissent, also, from the unwillingness of the majority to recognize that interlocutory review in this case was inappropriate and finally, from its failure to…

3Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Berube v. McKesson Wine & Spirits Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  2. Chavoor v. LewisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. Pollack v. KellyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  4. Bushnell v. BushnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  5. Krock v. Consolidated Mines & Power Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API