Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. MacEk
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 15, 1971No. Appeal, 143PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Cercone, J.,
Goldie Mae Macek1 was indicted on two counts: the first count charging possession of marijuana in violation of The Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act (Act of September 26, 1961, P. L. 1664, §1, 35 P.S. §780-1 et seq.) and the second count charging prostitution and assignation. After trial, the jury found her guilty of possession of marijuana but not guilty of prostitution and assignation.
The prostitution charge was based on the testimony of Police Officer Hanlon that defendant had offered him sexual relations for the price of $10.00 (ten dollars) after which solicitation he…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. LefkowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Paul Taglavore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- Worthington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Carr v. State Board of PharmacyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. SpriggsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. BarkleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. BenjaminSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.