Legal Opinion

Dickey v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 20, 1928No. 8 Div. 638PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRice, J.

The court has read the entire evidence in this case, sitting in banc. We are of the opinion that appellant’s motion for a new trial should have been granted. And this on the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction. The books are full of cases in which it has been held, axiomatically, it is true, that the same rules of-evidence apply in prosecutions for violations of our prohibition statutes that apply in prosecutions for other criminal offenses. And where the evidence, as here, in a prosecution for distilling prohibited liquors, or for unlawfully being in…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hudson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  2. Garsed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  3. Bolton v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. Davis v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1935
  5. Morris v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API