Legal Opinion

Morris v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 4, 1930No. 5 Div. 786PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSameord, J.

The corpus delicti was proven in this case without dispute; i. e., a whisky still complete and in operation and in the possession of parties there present who were exercising dominion or control over it. The defense was an alibi, and as to this issue the defendant offered much testimony tending to prove that he was not one of the parties present at the still at the time it was raided by the officers. After the evidence was all in, the court in its oral charge and as a part thereof charged the jury: “In the ordinary case of an alibi when a party charged with a crime attempts to prove that he…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jaques v. HortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  2. Birmingham Railway Light & Power Co. v. SeabornSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  3. McKenzie v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. Tatum v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  5. Alabama Trunk & Luggage Co. v. HauerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Clark v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Freeman v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. Summers v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  4. McCright v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. Summers v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API