Bolton v. State

Appellant was convicted of the offense of unlawfully distilling prohibited liquor.

We are still of the opinion that the law is as ■declared in the opinion in the case of Dickey v. State, 22 Ala. App. 375, 115 So. 848. But ■there are some circumstances, slight, it is perhaps true, that distinguish tMs case, from the one presented there. Here, the issue of appellant’s guilt, vel non, was properly left to the jury.

After the state’s witness Hudson had testified in the case, and been cross-examined, nnd after another state’s witness had done so, the said witness Hudson was recalled by the ■state…