Legal Opinion
Rudolph v. Alamo Rent a Car, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided January 28, 1997No. Civ. A. 2:96cv732PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
DOUMAR, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion to stay these proceedings and compel arbitration. For the reasons set forth below, this motion is hereby denied.
I. Background
Percilla D. Rudolph, a female, was employed by Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc. from September 2,1994 until September 1,1995. Rudolph does not belong to a union. In her complaint, she alleges that she was sexually harassed at work, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, codified at 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e, et seq., and Section 102 of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, codified…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hendrick v. Brown & Root, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1999
- SFC New Holdings, Inc. v. Earthgrains Co. (In Re GWI, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2001
- Koridze v. Fannie Mae Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009
- ROBERT FRANK McALPINE ARCH., INC. v. HeilpernSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
- In Re Winstar Communications, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.