Koridze v. Fannie Mae Corp.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
T.S. ELLIS, III, District Judge.
At issue in this Title VII 1 employment discrimination case is whether an arbitration clause in plaintiffs consulting agreement with defendant Predigo, LLC (“Predigo”) applies to plaintiffs gender discrimination, sexual harassment, and retaliation claims, and if so, whether arbitration must be compelled notwithstanding plaintiffs claim that the cost of arbitration prevents effective vindication of her Title VII rights.
For the reasons that follow, plaintiffs claims fall within the arbitration clause, and plaintiff has failed to show that the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Andresen v. IntePros Federal, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Bennett v. Dillard's, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011
- Concetta Rizzio v. Surpass Senior Living LLCArizona Supreme Court · 2021
- C.B. Fleet Co. v. Aspen Insurance UK Ltd.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2010
- Jaffe v. ZamoraDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.