Legal Opinion

Dauphin v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 2, 1986No. 6870-2-IIPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reed, A.C.J.

—DPPMB Associates appeals an award of attorney's fees levied against it in favor of the plaintiff, Gilbert Dauphin, on a theory of equitable indemnity. The trial court was persuaded that DPPMB had acted wrongfully in refusing Dauphin's demands and had thereby forced him to initiate his suit. We conclude that DPPMB did not act wrongfully and was acting reasonably to protect its interests. We therefore reverse the award of attorney's fees to Dauphin.

Dauphin sold a commercial building to Mark and Lynda Smith and their corporation, Woodmark, Inc., on a real estate installment sales…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. TEXAS v. FLORIDA Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Imperial Ice Co. v. RossierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Calbom v. KnudtzonWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  4. State Ex Rel. MacRi v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Manning v. LoidhamerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Walter Implement, Inc. v. FochtWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Schwebke v. Lutheran Social ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Roy v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  4. Blueberry Place Homeowners Ass'n v. Northward Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  5. Iowa Supply Co. v. Grooms & Co. ConstructionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API