Legal Opinion

State v. . Taylor

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 1, 1916PublishedCited by 5 opinions

INDICTMENT under section 3673, Revisal, for unlawfully and willfully removing a certain fence, tried at May Term, 1916, of New Hanover, before Stacy, J. Tbe jury rendered verdict of guilty. From tbe judgment rendered tbe defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

There are three assignments of error directed to tbe evidence. In our opinion, tbe evidence to which they are directed was not at all material and the assignments are without merit. They need no discussion. The defendant excepted to the following charge;

“The State contends that the prosecuting witness had a fence which had been in a certain place for twenty-three years, and that the defendant removed that fence without any authority from the prosecuting witness. I charge you, gentlemen, that if you find as a fact from the evidence, and you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that this…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. . RatliffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  2. State v. . MasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1852
  3. State v. . CorpeningSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. State v. . FenderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  5. State v. . HowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. CochranSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. State v. BissetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. State v. BissetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. State v. SpiveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
  5. State v. SpiveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API