Legal Opinion

CORDANCE CORPORATION v. Amazon. Com, Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided December 5, 2008No. Civil Action 06-491-MPTPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

MARY PATRICIA THYNGE, United States Magistrate Judge.

INTRODUCTION

In this patent matter, Cordance Corporation (“Cordance”) alleges that Amazon.com Inc. and Amazon Web Services, LLC (collectively, “Amazon”) infringe U.S. Patent Nos. 6,757,710 (“the '710 patent”), 6,044,205 (“the '205 patent”), 5,862,325 (“the '325 patent”), and 6,088,717 (“the '717 patent”). 1 Amazon counterclaimed for declaratory judgment that Cordance infringes its U.S. Patent No. 6,269,369 (“the '369 patent”).

THE COURT’S CLAIM CONSTRUCTION

At Wilmington, this 5th day of December, 2008, having reviewed the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  2. Lockheed Martin Corporation v. Space Systems/loral, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  3. Cordance Corp. v. Amazon. Com, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2007

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cordance Corp. v. Amazon. Com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  2. Cordance Corp. v. Amazon. Com, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API