Legal Opinion
Cordance Corp. v. Amazon. Com, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided November 20, 2007No. Civil Action 06-491-MPTPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER MARY PAT THYNGE, United States Magistrate Judge.
1. INTRODUCTION
In this patent matter, Cordance Corporation (“Cordance”) alleges that Amazon.com, Inc. (“Amazon”) infringes U.S. Patent No. 6,757,710 (“the '710 patent”). Amazon counterclaimed for declaratory judgment that Cordance infringes its U.S. Patent No. 6,269,369 (“the '369 patent”). Cordance moved to dismiss the counterclaim, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on the basis of no actual controversy. This memorandum order addresses whether there is an actual case or controversy within the meaning of the Declaratory…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Cardinal Chemical Co. v. Morton International, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Bp Chemicals Limited v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- SanDisk Corp. v. STMicroelectronics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Benitec Australia, Ltd. v. Nucleonics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- CORDANCE CORPORATION v. Amazon. Com, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2008