Legal Opinion

Gowder v. Loggins

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 31, 1940No. 28375Published

1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.

1. In a suit in a justice’s court on a summons, to whicii the account sued on is attached, as follows: “In re: Digging Tunnel Merk Mica M'ine. Balance due to date $54.90” it was not necessary that the copy of the account show whether it was based on an express written or parol contract or on an implied contract to pay for extra labor and materials not provided for in an express contract. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Drake, 21 Ga. App. 81 (94 S. E. 65); Wright v. Pearson, 48 Ga. App. 207 (172 S. E. 590).

2. A demurrer to a suit on open account on the ground that no itemized statement is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. DrakeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  2. Wright v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API