Legal Opinion
Wright v. Pearson
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided January 10, 1934No. 23131PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.
Ivory Pearson brought a suit against D. D. Wright for a balance due for sawmill timber on lot of land No. 216, which timber had already been cut and appropriated by the defendant. The defendant contends that the plaintiff could not recover unless he showed a full and complete performance of a certain written contract introduced in evidence by the defendant. The jury found a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant certioraried the ease to the superior court and his certiorari was denied. He then excepted to the denial of the certiorari and brought the case to this court.
The evidence for the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Talbotton Railroad v. GibsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Williams Manufacturing Co. v. Warner Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Johnson v. QuinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1874
- Southern Railway Co. v. BranchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- Cameron v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pollard v. PhelpsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Floyd v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- Fleischer Knitting Mills Inc. v. GreenbergCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Gay v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
- Gowder v. LogginsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940