State v. Riley
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Fain, Judge.
Defendant-appellant Ervin L. Riley appeals from his conviction and sentence for aggravated trafficking with a prior drug offense, a felony of the second degree. Riley contends that the trial court improperly entered a conviction and sentence for aggravated trafficking with a prior drug offense because there was no evidence upon which the trial court could have found him to have had a conviction for a prior drug offense.
We conclude that there is evidence from which the trial court could have found, and did apparently find, that Riley had a conviction for a prior drug offense, but…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. AllenOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. TateOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. SandersOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. AdamsOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v.BiblerOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. HillOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. Fatica, Unpublished Decision (10-15-1999)Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999