Legal Opinion

State v. Riley

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 23, 1994No. 14450PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fain, Judge.

Defendant-appellant Ervin L. Riley appeals from his conviction and sentence for aggravated trafficking with a prior drug offense, a felony of the second degree. Riley contends that the trial court improperly entered a conviction and sentence for aggravated trafficking with a prior drug offense because there was no evidence upon which the trial court could have found him to have had a conviction for a prior drug offense.

We conclude that there is evidence from which the trial court could have found, and did apparently find, that Riley had a conviction for a prior drug offense, but…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. AllenOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. TateOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SandersOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. State v. AdamsOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. State v.BiblerOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. State v. HillOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. State v. Fatica, Unpublished Decision (10-15-1999)Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API