Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Broadwater County v. Rosman
Montana Supreme Court
Decided February 25, 1929No. 6,375PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The phrase "during the continuance of these presents," in the bond in question, has a meaning equivalent to the phrase "during the life of this agreement." (See United States F. G. Co. v.American Bonding Co., 31 Okla. 669, 122 P. 142; Bartels v.Davis, 34 Mont. 285, 85 P. 1027; Pacific County v.Illinois Surety Co., 234 Fed. 97; 9 C.J. 35.)
The bond is also conditioned to "render a full account" upon request "during the time herein stated as aforesaid." The only time stated as aforesaid is the time within which deposits might be made and which expired on the first Monday of March, 1924. Unless…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Yellowstone County v. First Trust & Savings BankMontana Supreme Court · 1912
- Stockton Savings & Loan Society v. PurvisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Ferry & Co. v. ForquerMontana Supreme Court · 1921
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. City of PensacolaSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
- Lee v. Lee Gold Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1924
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Black v. MartinMontana Supreme Court · 1930
- Musselshell Valley Farming & Livestock Co. v. CooleyMontana Supreme Court · 1929
- State Ex Rel. Saxtorph v. District Court, Fergus CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1954
- State Ex Rel. Loney v. Industrial Accident BoardMontana Supreme Court · 1930
- Kelsey v. School District No. 25Montana Supreme Court · 1929
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.