Legal Opinion

United States v. United States Steel Corporation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 12, 1964PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEINFBLD, District Judge.

This is a consolidated motion by all the defendants, eight corporations and two individuals, to dismiss the indictment herein, charging them and others with conspiracy in restraint of trade in carbon steel sheets in violation of section 1 of the Sherman Act. 1 The motion is based upon the ground that it fails to charge an offense with the definiteness, certainty and specificity required by the Fifth and Sixth Amendments to the Constitution and Rule 7(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

The indictment contains one count, divided into seven headings, within…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Fischbach and Moore, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. United States v. TedescoDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. United States v. American Honda Motor CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1967
  4. United States v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1967
  5. United States v. Richter Concrete CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API