Legal Opinion

United States v. Tedesco

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 7, 1977No. Crim. 77-72-1, 77-72-2PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

HERMAN, District Judge.

On June 2, 1977, indictments were returned against James J. Tedesco and Thomas J. Gillen by a grand jury sitting in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. The indictments charged that the two Defendants, along with numerous coconspirators, 1 engaged in a continuing combination and conspiracy in unreasonable 2 restraint of interstate trade and commerce in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, as amended prior to December 21, 1974, 15 U.S.C. § l. 3

It is alleged that the combination and conspiracy began as early as 1961, the exact date being unknown to the grand jurors,…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Nash v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. Portsmouth Paving Corporation and R. Curtis Saunders, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
  2. United States v. Gerald L. Singer, United States of America v. Raymond E. WagnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  3. United States v. GoldDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
  4. United States v. Climatemp, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
  5. State v. HicksTennessee Supreme Court · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API