Legal Opinion
Garrett v. Seymour
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 23, 2007No. 06-7029PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*837ORDER AND JUDGMENT**
TERRENCE L. O’BRIEN, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant Dwayne Garrett, proceeding pro se, appeals from the district court’s sua sponte dismissal of his complaints. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. Mr. Garrett has engaged in frivolous and abusive litigation; filing restrictions are necessary to arrest that practice.
In the first of two actions that form the basis of this appeal, Mr. Garrett alleged that the defendants, who are federal judges, federal-court clerks and staff, and a United States attorney and staff, deprived him of in excess of $1,500,000…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Sutton v. Utah State School for the Deaf & BlindCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Anant Kumar Tripati v. William C. BeamanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Grandbouche v. ClancyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- In Re Rainsford J. Winslow and Winifred W. Winslow, Debtors. Rainsford J. Winslow and Winifred W. Winslow v. C. Gail HunterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
3Cited by36 opinions
- Rowley v. MorantDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
- Garrett v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- BMO Harris Banks N.A. v. B T Auto Transport LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2023
- Beverly v. MartinDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2023
- Boulden v. Tafoya LuceroDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2023
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.