Samuel Connely v. State

Appellant, Samuel Connely, appeals the postconviction court’s order denying his motion for relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Appellant alleged eight grounds in his motion— each asserting ineffective assistance of counsel. The postconviction court summarily denied all of Appellant’s claims. Grounds 2, 4, 5, 6, and 7 are conclusively refuted by the portions of the record that the postcon-viction court attached to its order. Appellant did not address Ground 8 in his brief; therefore, it is deemed abandoned. See Ward v. State, 19 So.3d 1060, 1060 (Fla. 5th DCA…