Legal Opinion
Roper v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 13, 1992No. 91-2502PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
608 So.2d 533 (1992)
Edward ROPER, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 91-2502.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
November 13, 1992.
Russell E. Crawford, Orlando, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.
COBB, Judge.
The question posed here by the appellant concerns the discretion of a trial judge in dealing with a jury request to review crucial trial testimony. The underlying, and dispositive, issue is whether the exercise of that discretion may be avoided without infringing on…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- David W. McKay v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Kelley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Haliburton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
- Huhn v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hazuri v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
- Hendricks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Frasilus v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- State v. BarrowSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
- Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. DuignanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.