Legal Opinion
Heitler v. Brooklyn Shield & Rubber Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 14, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBEEB, District Judge.
This is an action in equity, to restrain the alleged infringement by the defendant of patent No. 1,353,-750, issued by the United States Patent Office to-- Kurt Heitler, dated September 21, 1920, and for damages. The defendant interposed the answer of invalidity and noninfringement. The plaintiff Rubberized Sheeting & Specialty Company is the patentee’s licensee under an oral license.
Plaintiffs base this suit on claim 2 of the patent in suit, which reads- as follows:
“2. A garment, comprising a body including trunk’and limb encircling portions, said garment being…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Merrill v. YeomansSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Knapp v. MorssSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bragg-Kliesrath Corp. v. FarrellDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1929
- Wolff v. Stewart & Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1937