Legal Opinion

Bragg-Kliesrath Corp. v. Farrell

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided April 10, 1929No. 3643PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

This is a suit in equity based' on the alleged infringement of patent No. 1,076,198, issued by the United States Patent Office to James T. Dickson, for. vacuum brake, dated October 21, 1913, on application filed August 7, 1912; and of patent No. 1,321,150, issued by the United States Patent Office to Henry C. Root, assignor to Prest-O-Lite Company, Inc., for controlling valve for vacuum-operated power means, dated November 11, 1919, on application filed May 9, 1917.

These patents by mesne assignments became vested in plaintiff, whose title is not contested.

The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Westinghouse v. Boyden Power Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. White v. DunbarSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Heitler v. Brooklyn Shield & Rubber Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bragg-Kliesrath Corp. v. Walter S. Vogel & Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API