Legal Opinion
Martin v. Rasmussen
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided August 21, 2014No. 20121058-CAPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PEARCE, Judge:
1 Shane and Terrilyn Rasmussen appeal from the district court's order enforcing a settlement offer that they had made to Gary and Bethann Martin pursuant to rule 68 of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure. The district court's order also awarded attorney fees to the Martins pursuant to Utah Code section T8B-5-825. We affirm the district court's enforcement of the settlement offer but reverse its attorney fee award.
BACKGROUND
T2 The Rasmussens live next door to the Martins in Sandy, Utab. The Martins have owned their property since 2005. The Ras-mussens purchased their…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Peterson v. the Sunrider Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
- Bilanzich v. LonettiUtah Supreme Court · 2007
- Hal Taylor Associates v. Unionamerica, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
- James Perkins v. U S West CommunicationsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Entrepreneur, Ltd. v. YasunaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brick House Properties, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2021