MacDonald v. Rosenfeld
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.
There appears in the clerk’s record of this action for accounting and an injunction, two notices of appeal filed by plaintiffs W. W. MacDonald and John R. Pom-fret: the first from an interlocutory decree, and the second from the whole of the final judgment. There also appears a notice of appeal by defendant Max Rosenfeld setting forth five designated grounds of appeal.
Plaintiffs’ opening brief states as grounds of appeal that the whole of the judgment is erroneous and in defendant’s brief it is contended that the court ‘1 erred in allowing plaintiffs a credit of $30,734.13.” The latter…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Estate of PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Lyon v. GossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Bard v. KentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Neel v. BarnardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Lane Mortgage Co. v. CrenshawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bohman v. BergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Government Guarantee Fund of Republic of Finland v. Hyatt CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Chisholm v. RedfieldNevada Supreme Court · 1959
- De Vrahnos v. GeorgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Leonard v. GallagherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.