Legal Opinion
Conseco Finance Corporation v. Sharman
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided December 7, 2001No. 1000734PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Conseco Finance Corporation appeals from the trial court's order denying its motion to compel arbitration. As to that order, we affirm. Conseco also appeals from the trial court's order denying its motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), Ala.R.Civ.P. William Mac Sharman, as executor of the estate of Samuel Joseph Martin, deceased, and as executor of the estate of Flora Jean Martin, deceased, filed a motion with this Court to dismiss Conseco's appeal as to the denial of its motion to dismiss. We grant Sharman's motion.
I. Facts
Timothy Paul Martin was appointed attorney-in-fact for his…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Thomson-Csf, S.A. v. American Arbitration Association, Evans & Sutherland Computer CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Sunkist Soft Drinks, Inc., Del Monte Corporation, Nabisco Brands, Inc. v. Sunkist Growers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Jim Burke Automotive, Inc. v. BeaversSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- TranSouth Financial Corp. v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Sisters of Visitation v. COCHRAN PLASTERING CO. INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ex Parte CainSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Custom Performance, Inc. v. DawsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
- SouthTrust Bank v. FordSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- MTA, Inc. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2012
- Honea v. Raymond James Fin. Servs., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.