Legal Opinion

MTA, Inc. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 7, 2012No. 1111167PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STUART, Justice.

MTA, Inc., appeals the order of the Madison Circuit Court holding that MTA’s claims against Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fen-ner & Smith, Inc., a division of Bank of Ameriea Corporation (“Merrill Lynch”), were subject to an arbitration agreement and compelling MTA to arbitrate those claims. We reverse and remand.

I

On January 21, 1994, MTA entered into a deferred-compensation agreement (“the DCA”) with its employee, Yvonne Sanders. Pursuant to the terms of the DCA, MTA was obligated to pay Yvonne $270,000 in 120 equal monthly installments beginning the month following her 50th…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Homes of Legend, Inc. v. McColloughSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  2. Stamey v. EasterSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. Cook's Pest Control, Inc. v. BoykinSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  4. Smith v. Mark Dodge, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  5. In Re It Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. SSC Montgomery Cedar Crest Operating Co. v. BoldingSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
  2. Locklear Auto. Grp., Inc. v. HubbardSupreme Court of Alabama · 2017
  3. Dannelly Enterprises, LLC v. Palm Beach Grading, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2016
  4. Daphne Auto., LLC v. E. Shore Neurology Clinic, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2017
  5. Board of Trustees of The University of Alabama, The v. Humana IncDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2024

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API