Legal Opinion

State v. Jessup

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 29, 2009No. 030130518; A123246Published

1Per curiam

This case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court, which vacated our prior decision, State v. Jessup, 202 Or App 227, 120 P3d 1257 (2005) (Jessup I), in light of State v. Ramirez, 343 Or 505, 173 P3d 817 (2007), adh’d to as modified on recons, 344 Or 195, 179 P3d 673 (2008), and State v. Fults, 343 Or 515, 173 P3d 822 (2007). State v. Jessup, 345 Or 315, 195 P3d 63 (2008). Defendant has filed a motion to allow her appeal to proceed, arguing that her case is not moot— despite her acknowledgment that she completed her sentence that is the subject of this appeal on November 10, 2008 —…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. FultsOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Brumnett v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. RamirezOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Joint Council of Teamsters 37 v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. Keeney v. University of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API