Legal Opinion
People v. Lovejoy
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 9, 1970No. Crim. 8624PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELKINGNGTON, J.
The People have appealed from a superior court order setting aside an information based upon a motion made pursuant to Penal Code section 995.
The order was grounded on the testimony taken at the preliminary examination. Following the earlier hearing, the magistrate, a municipal court judge, had found reasonable and probable cause to believe that each of the defendants, Dallas Arnold Lovejoy, Dennis Ray Venegas, Jimmy Lloyd Brummell, and Richard Chester Allen, were guilty of the offense of possessing marijuana, in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11530.
In the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Badillo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. DaughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- People v. CockrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Emslie v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. BalassyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- People v. FreundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- People v. Jonathan M.California Court of Appeal · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.