Legal Opinion

Whitlock's, Inc. v. Manley

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 21, 1937PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAvery, J.

The complaint in this action was in two counts. In the first count, it was alleged with some detail that Roy E. Manley purchased antiques on a consignment basis, that he had sold all or part of the merchandise and failed to account therefor or to make any payment thereon or to return any of the merchandise remaining unsold, and that in obtaining money received from the sale of the merchandise, he was acting in a fiduciary capacity for the benefit of Whit-lock’s Book Store, Inc., and in the sale was acting as its agent. The second count of the complaint was the same as the first count except…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ell Dee Clothing Co. v. MarshNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Evans, Coleman & Evans, Ltd. v. PistorinoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  3. Sullivan v. ShailorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Scribner v. O'Brien, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  2. Castaldo v. D'ERAMOSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
  3. FCM Group, Inc. v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  4. Zanoni v. HudonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  5. National Bank v. D. W. Standrod & Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1928

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API