Legal Opinion

Evans, Coleman & Evans, Ltd. v. Pistorino

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 23, 1923PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This is a suit in equity by a judgment creditor of Dorman-Huxford Company against that corporation and several other persons alleged to be indebted to it on account of transactions connected with those out of which sprang the main indebtedness to the plaintiff. The case was referred to a master under a rule requiring him to report his findings. No evidence is reported and those findings must be accepted as true. So far as now pertinent they are as follows:

Dorman-Huxford Company is a Massachusetts corporation in business in Boston as a broker in canned goods and dried fruits, selling from…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Keller v. AshfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Bibb v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Inhabitants of Westfield v. MayoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  4. Marsch v. Southern New England RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  5. Connolly v. BolsterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Lowell Bar Ass'n v. LoebMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. New York Central Railroad Co. v. William Culkeen & Sons Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  3. Nissenberg v. FellemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  4. Exchange Realty Co. v. BinesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  5. Broadway National Bank v. HaywardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API